Grey literature scoping review: a synthesis of the application of participatory methodologies in underrepresented groups at an elevated risk of dementia

0
Grey literature scoping review: a synthesis of the application of participatory methodologies in underrepresented groups at an elevated risk of dementia
  • The Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (MRC CFAS). Psychol Med. 1998;28:319–35.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brayne C, Matthews FE, Magnus A, McGee. Health and ill-health in the older population in England and Wales: the medical research Council cognitive function and ageing study (MRC CFAS). Age Ageing. 2001;30(1):53–62.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Alzheimer’s society. Dementia UK report 2014. https://www.alzheimers.org.uk/about-us/policy-and-influencing/dementia-uk-report

  • Kingston A, Adelina Comas-Herrera, and, Jagger C. Forecasting the care needs of the older population in England over the next 20 years: estimates from the population ageing and care simulation (PACSim) modelling study. Lancet Public Health. 2018a;3(9):e447–55.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston A, Robinson L, Booth H, Knapp M, Jagger C, and Modem Project. Projections of multi-morbidity in the older population in England to 2035: estimates from the Population AgeingCare Simulation (PACSim) model. Ageageing. 2018;47(3):374–380.

  • Gao L, Green E, Barnes LE, Brayne C, Matthews FE. Louise Robinson, and Antony Arthur. Changing non-participation in epidemiological studies of older people: evidence from the cognitive function and ageing study I and II. Age Ageing. 2015;44(5):867–73.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Redwood S, Paramjit S. Gill. Under-representation of minority ethnic groups in research—call for action. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63(612):342–3.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec S. Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic Racial Stud. 2007;30(6):1024–54.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton S, Phillimore J, Bradby H, Padilla B, Lopes J, Samerski S, Humphris R. Access to healthcare in superdiverse neighbourhoods. Volume 55. Health & Place; 2019. pp. 128–35.

  • Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the lancet commission (396, Pg 413, 2020). Lancet. 2023;402(10408):1132–1132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuben A, Richmond-Rakerd LS, Milne B, Shah D, Pearson A, Hogan S, Ireland D, et al. Dementia, dementia’s risk factors and premorbid brain structure are concentrated in disadvantaged areas: National register and birth‐cohort geographic analyses. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2024;20(5):3167–78.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranson JM, Rittman T, Hayat S, Brayne C, Jessen F, Blennow K, Cornelia, van Duijn et al. Modifiable risk factors for dementia and dementia risk profiling. A user manual for Brain Health Services—part 2 of 6. Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy. 2021;13:1–12.

  • Flatt JD, Johnson JK, Karpiak SE, Seidel L, Larson B, Brennan-Ing M. Correlates of subjective cognitive decline in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender older adults. J Alzheimer’s Disease. 2018;64(1):91–102.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillimore JA, Bradby H, Brand T. Superdiversity, population health and health care: opportunities and challenges in a changing world. Public Health. 2019;172:93–8.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas N. Community and Public Health Approaches to Dementia Research (ComPHAD): Project Overview. (2024): https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18802.52163

  • Petts J, Leach B. Evaluating methods for public participation: literature review. Bristol: Environment Agency; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall A, Jewkes R. What is participatory research? Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(12):1667–76.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock J, McGuire M, Alexandra Rogers. Multidisciplinary perspectives on co-creation. Sci Communication. 2018;40(4):541–52.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein SR. A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Planners. 1969;35(4):216–24.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Leask CF, Sandlund M, Skelton DA, Altenburg TM, Cardon G, Mai JM, Chinapaw ID, Bourdeaudhuij M, Verloigne. Sebastien FM chastin, and grandstand, safe step and teenage girls on the move research groups. Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions. Res Involv Engagem. 2019;5:1–16.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Messiha K, Altenburg TM, Schreier M, Longworth GR, Thomas N, Chastin S, Chinapaw MJ. Enriching the evidence base of co-creation research in public health with methodological principles of critical realism. Crit Public Health. 2024;34(1):1–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Alzheimer’s Society. (2022). Dementia and co-creation. A practical guide to designing products and services. Retrieved from Alzheimer’s Society September 2024.

  • Dementia Voices 2023. The Dementia Enquirers Gold Standards for Ethical Research PDF. www.dementiavoices.org.uk. Retrieved September 2024.

  • Morris L, Dumville J, Treweek S, Miah N, Curtis F, Bower P. Evaluating a tool to improve engagement and recruitment of under-served groups in trials. Trials 23, no. 1 (2022): 867.

  • O’Donnell P, Tierney E, Nurse AO’CarrollD, Anne MacFarlane. Exploring levers and barriers to accessing primary care for marginalised groups and identifying their priorities for primary care provision: a participatory learning and action research study. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15:1–16.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris L, Dumville J, Treweek S, Miah N, Curtis F, Bower P. Evaluating a tool to improve engagement and recruitment of under-served groups in trials. Trials. 2022;23(1):867.

  • Bonevski B, Randell M, Paul C, Chapman K, Twyman L, Bryant J, Brozek I, Clare Hughes. Reaching the hard-to-reach: a systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:1–29.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright B. Consumers or Citizens? Whose Voice Will Healthwatch Represent and Will It Matter? Comment on Challenges Facing Healthwatch, a New Consumer Champion in England. International journal of health policy and management. 2016;5(11):667.

  • Crowder SJ, Tanner AL, Martha A, Dawson IC, Felsman SB, Hassmiller LC, Miller SC, Reinhard, Debra A. Toney. Better together: coalitions committed to advancing health equity. Nurs Outlook. 2022;70(6):S48–58.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Benzies KM, Premji S, Alix Hayden K, Serrett K. State-of‐the‐evidence reviews: advantages and challenges of including grey literature. Worldviews Evidence‐Based Nurs. 2006;3(2):55–61.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Grindell C, Coates E, Croot L, Alicia O’Cathain. The use of co-production, co-design and co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):877.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobe J, Gustafsson L, Kim Walder. Co-creation and stroke rehabilitation: A scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2023;45(3):562–74.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnello DM, Balaskas G, Steiner A, Chastin S. Mapping the Co-Creation landscape and exposing the methodological gap between researchers and practitioners: A Health CASCADE Systematic Methods Overview.

  • Vogel R, Moulder E, Mike Huggins. The extent of public participation. Public Manag. 2014;96(2):6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters MDJ, Christina Godfrey P, McInerney H, Khalil P, Larsen C, Marnie D, Pollock AC, Tricco, Munn Z. Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols. JBI Evid Synthesis. 2022;20(4):953–68.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster ED, Ariel Deardorff. Open science framework (OSF). J Med Libr Association: JMLA. 2017;105(2):203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arksey H, Lisa OM. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Deane K, Delbecque L, Gorbenko O, Hamoir AM, Hoos A, Nafria B, Pakarinen C et al. Co-creation of patient engagement quality guidance for medicines development: an international multistakeholder initiative. BMJ innovations. 2019;5(1).

  • Messiha K, Chinapaw MJM, Hans CFF, Ket Q, An V, Anand-Kumar GR, Longworth S, Chastin, Teatske M. Altenburg. Systematic review of contemporary theories used for co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health. J Public Health. 2023;45(3):723–37.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • *Agnello DM, Loisel *QuentinEA, An Q, Balaskas G, Chrifou R, Dall P, Janneke, de Boer et al. Establishing a Health CASCADE–Curated Open-Access database to consolidate knowledge about Co-creation: Novel Artificial intelligence–assisted methodology based on systematic reviews. Journal of medical Internet research. 2023;25:e45059.

  • Brennan L, Brewster L, Lunn J, Egboko F, Stres DP, Patel P, Rachel Isba. How do hospitals address health inequalities experienced by children and young people: a grey literature scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2023;13(4):e071682.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin K, Stapleton J, Kirkpatrick SI, Hanning RM, Scott T. Leatherdale. Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada. Systematic reviews. 2015;4:1–10.

  • Special Issue Editors. Birgit Glorius and Jeroen Doomernik, and Jonathan darling. Asylum in austere times: instability, privatization and experimentation within the UK asylum dispersal system. J Refugee Stud. 2016;29(4):483–505.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rustage K, Crawshaw A, Majeed-Hajaj S, Deal A, Nellums L, Ciftci Y, Fuller SS, Goldsmith L. Friedland, and Sally hargreaves. Participatory approaches in the development of health interventions for migrants: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2021;11(10):e053678.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver K, Kothari A, Nicholas Mays. The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research? Health Res Policy Syst. 2019;17:1–10.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel SS, Rebecca K, Webster N, Greenberg D, Weston, Samantha K, Brooks. Research fatigue in COVID-19 pandemic and post-disaster research: causes, consequences and recommendations. Disaster Prev Management: Int J. 2020;29(4):445–55.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Messiha K, Altenburg TM, Schreier M, Longworth GR, Thomas N, Chastin S, Chinapaw MJ. Enriching the evidence base of co-creation research in public health with methodological principles of critical realism. Crit Public Health. 2024;34(1):1–19.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn DL, Amanda E, Hoffmann M, Felzien JW, LeMaster J, Xu, Lyle J. Fagnan. Tokenism in patient engagement. Family practice. 2017;34(3):290–295.

  • Sibley M. Patient Experience Library. The Health Foundation 2024. Last accessed June 2024.

  • Davis KA. Co-researching with people living with dementia: a co-operative inquiry. The University of Manchester (United Kingdom); 2019.

  • Bellavia E. The dementia research involvement study: exploring and explaining the involvement of people living with dementia and family carers through patient and public involvement activities. PhD diss. Newcastle University; 2023.

  • Longworth G, Raffaella K, Goh DM, Agnello K, Messiha M, Beeckman. Jorge Raul Zapata-Restrepo, Greet Cardon, Sebastien Chastin, and Maria Giné-Garriga. A review of implementation and evaluation frameworks for public health interventions to inform co-creation: a Health CASCADE study. Health research policy and systems. 2024;22(1):39.

  • Proctor EK, Alicia C, Bunger R, Lengnick-Hall DR, Gerke JK, Martin RJ, Phillips, Julia C. Swanson. Ten years of implementation outcomes research: a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2023;18(1):31.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozkul D. Participatory research: still a one-sided research agenda? Migration Lett. 2020;17(2):229–37.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaventa J, Cornwall A. The SAGE handbook of action research. (2008).

  • Shannon K, Bail K. Dementia-friendly community initiatives: an integrative review. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28:11–2.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover L, Dyson J, Cowdell F, Kinsey D. Healthy ageing in a deprived Northern UK City: A Co-Creation study. Health Soc Care Commun. 2020;28(6):2233–42.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Slattery P, Saeri AK, Peter Bragge. Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020;18:1–13.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *